Citation must be to the preferred source if possible. The Index provides useful cross-references and will help you learn the categories of citation.Ĭonfirm that the preferred source has been used by the author for the type of authority cited. Use it for most if not every source you are cite checking. Use the index at the back of the Bluebook when you begin to search for applicable rules. ALWAYS review the relevant rules in their entirety. CAVEAT: Note that the citations are for illustration purposes only and do not cover the nuances of each rule. In short, this research is a postmodern reading of the technological landscape of the Ave Valley supported and structured by its natural original topographic condition.Use the Quick Reference: Law Review Footnotes table located on the front inside cover of the Bluebook to help you identify the appropriate rule for the type of authority cited. The temporal context of research is limited to the present. The contribution to be reached is a nihilistic research on the topology of local artificial use and occupation settlements, analyzed from the technological landscape and supported wi h the concept of soil morphology as an innovation to the canonical studies structured by the road network of the Ave Valley. The methodology is the open and sensorial rationalism, influenced by the hegemonic cultural domain of the United States since the end of World War II, also called postmodern. The intention is the topological confrontation of the actual technological landscape, from its logics of soil use and occupation, with an orographic and topographic local structuring (soil morphology) as the local natural origin still identified at present. This area is conceptualized, visually, as being a Portuguese technological landscape sample of rural, industrial, and computational components, largely parallel to other important ones such as the Douro Valley. This paper focuses on a case study delimited by a territorial area of Portugal, simultaneously of great historical patrimony value and of contemporary urban dispersion, belonging to the Ave Valley. The paper submitted for this presentation explores why Zacchaeus was created, what the men and women who joined this group desired and why it eventually splintered in to a different group. “Project Zacchaeus” grew out of the dissatisfaction of the leader with the message Courage offered to” gay” men and women. Though it had the support of Catholic Orders like the Legion of Christ and several Bishops and Archbishops, the movement has remained peripheral never having more than ten people in each group. Courage branched out in to diverse countries of the western hemisphere “Mexico” was the first outpost of the movement, which later expanded to Puerto Rico, El Salvador and other Hispanic-American countries. Courage unlike the other two, was sufficiently Conservative in outlook to merit the support and recognition of diverse groups within Catholicism. Under the pontificate of John Paul II, these movements were excluded from the Church, unwelcome to operate within church property in the United States with little or no support from Bishops who followed the Vatican ideology. It was a Conservative option to other ministries like Dignity and The New Ways Ministry who desired to incorporate the tenets of the” gay” movement with certain aspects of “Catholic” religion and spirituality. Courage was founded in the 1980’s as an outgrowth of the Culture Wars in America.
The movement, which ceased to exist in March 2014, had a different purpose than the one set up by Father John Harvey, founder of Courage a religious movement that asks “Catholic” men and women to live within the bounds of chastity. In July 2013 a schism within the apostolate called “Courage Latino” went unnoticed by society in general a small group of five men led by a parish priest decided to form an alliance of people who have “same sex attraction” (SSA) and also desire to remain in the “Catholic” Church.
0 kommentar(er)
